License Plate Swingers

Impact of "Palestinian WikiLeaks"

Impact of "Palestinian WikiLeaks"

The Qatari news channel, Al-Jazeera has starred in what already is known as "WikiLeaks Palestinian." Just weeks after the real boom generated by the organization headed by Julian Assange immoral, publishing official documents to U.S. classified information, Al-Jazeera emulated the action carried out and did the same with documents belonging to the Palestinian Authority (PA) . The secrets revealed contain information about the peace negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians developed in recent years, to the Annapolis process including (estimated about 1700 documents). The event is recent and the air in the tense atmosphere is still warm breath waiting for major impact.
"If the documents were stolen from the computers in the office of the Department of the PLO Negotiations" : recognition of the origin of the information belongs to Saeb Erekat, Palestinian chief negotiator, announced on Aurora Digital. Erekat, who is contemplating suing the TV station because he believes that publications are not entirely true and decontextualized, is not the only Palestinian leader who has had a strong reaction against leaks. The PA chairman, Mahmoud Abbas, joined the attribution of falsity of what was published by Al-Jazeera, adding that it was "a disgrace" and take action thereon, to which he said: "We know how to deal with their programs," . Moreover, according to reports by the Jewish News Agency, hundreds of supporters of Fatah, the ruling party, rallied in the Muqata presidential compound in Ramallah, and burned portraits of the emir of Qatar and Israeli flags with the logo Al-Jazeera.
Moreover, the leaks have also produced their obvious effect on Israel, albeit on a smaller scale. This is because the main Israeli officials involved in the negotiations revealed (Ehud Olmert and Tzipi Livni) today are not in government positions occupied by those times (Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, respectively), but the political cost risk for the future is intact. Olmert announced through his office, that filtering is inaccurate, while Livni is expected that a greater depth, as it continues its campaign road to the next election.
Why so many repercussions? Why the fuss? We split. Beyond the obvious and logical political reaction to such an act revealing secret information about the peace process's most famous (not so best known), promoted (no more understand why), rumbling (not least muted) the world, there to discover that many interests are at stake, and those who believed firmly in their positions and charges, may lose by checkmate.

the Palestinian side, in what is revealed is the acceptance of Abbas that it is impossible the return of all Palestinian refugees to Israel: "It would be unreasonable to expect Israel to absorb five or even a million refugees. That would be the end of the State of Israel ". In what follows an agreement to return 10,000 refugees only within a decade, at a rate of 1000 per year. According to figures from the PA and UNRWA (the Palestinian agency of the United Nations for Palestinian refugees) the number of refugees is 7 million. This, of course, counting not only refugees but also their descendants, and all the corrupt people and liars leaders of both institutions are adding occurs, making the sum in a spooky number. Abbas knows that Israel does not accept millions of refugees for two reasons: because the demand for right of return is unjustified and without legal foundation, and because as you said, such acceptance would be the end of Israel (mean automatic loss of the Jewish majority within the limits of the country which would entail the loss after the Jewish character of the state). In support of this, we must add Emmanuel Navon analysis done for "Seeking Truth": "And while the situation of refugees in the world except the Palestinians, was occupied by the High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), only for Palestinian refugees created a special agency and particularly the UN, UNRWA. The UNHCR defines a refugee as a person living outside the country of their nationality (which would negate those who fled to other parts of the Mandate) as a result of expulsion, by contrast, the UNRWA extends that definition to the descendants of refugees ". That is, a double definition discriminating them given a preferential status to the Palestine refugees over the other, widening the field of consideration, complicates matters further. Especially when for many years the Palestinians have made this right of return (if not desire to destroy Israel) a political weapon to abuse, illegitimacy, illegal and blackmail. Therefore, the apparent resignation of the Palestinian right to return of refugees will be seen by the Palestinian public as a betrayal of one of the fiercest of Abbas principles when negotiating. The president of the AP as he fears being seen to abandon the refugees of their people after promising repeatedly to return to his old home, enough to be questioned again in his office and liable to expulsion by opponents or forced to resign by popular consensus.
the Israeli side, Olmert's proposal for acceptance of 10000 refugees, clarifies that it is solely for humanitarian reasons, not the right of return is only an empty political slogan without legal basis in international law. Ynetnews reports that Olmert's idea, according to the documents, suggest that Israel recognize the suffering of Palestinian refugees but would not be responsible for them. It also demanded that the agreement should also mention the suffering of the Israelis. The figure of the 10000 refugees is also a gesture Olmert to continue the process (since it does not shrink from the previous offer on the subject made by Barak to Arafat at Camp David II, but keeps it), as well as symbolic place partly to give the Palestinian claim for more devoid of legality as it was, in view of the support that the AP may receive from his people, to strengthen the alleged peace partner. But as we can see from his reaction to the leak, the Palestinian leadership knew that despite the support they could provide were playing hide. And Olmert, even though Israel had established its position and maintained the relatively low number of refugees, Palestinians knew more than 10000 in Israel, with many descendants that they could be guided by the Arab birth rate, and the dangers of education received Judeophobic terrorist camps deplorable conditions, would not content to vast sectors of Israeli society. While it could be considered a gesture towards peace, it is also true that it was opening the door to claims settled in any of the Palestinians, which experience has shown that is used as leverage to jump to more claims, also illegal, unfounded , and crazy at times.

Another highlight of the revelations is territorial. The Israeli side led by Tzipi Livni as head of diplomacy and negotiation, as described, gave a territorial exchange, transfer the cities populated by Israeli Arabs Bartaa, Baka al Gharbiyah Baka al Sharkiya and Beit Safafa (the latter is part of Jerusalem). The Palestinian side, in turn, agreed that in Jerusalem, Israel would keep sovereignty over most of its Jewish neighborhoods in the east. The Temple Mount and the Temple Mount, would be in the care of an international body that would guarantee the rights of the two involved.
If so, the deal would mean major concessions by both Israel and the PA: Israel move towards the division of Jerusalem exchanging some villages and maintaining sovereignty over others, and the AP would relinquish all claim the eastern part as a future Palestinian capital. Both have to give up Jerusalem as capital of their state only, and both would eventually entry of international forces to the Holy City, would be composed of the United States, Israel, the PA, Egypt and Jordan.
the Israeli side can be expected adverse reactions to the scheme, with good reason: Jerusalem is the law and history eternal and indivisible capital of the Jewish people, the Jew is the only government that has ensured freedom of worship, and the division of the city the prize of the Six Day War (the reunification) is broken and divided national history with her. Not to mention the more than address strategic and political reasons advised never to divide Jerusalem.
the Palestinian side would be reduced by one step of their claims to the entire eastern part of the city as capital of a future state, and also would give the esplanade of the Mosque to the control of an international body when in the past it was to manufacture and launch an uprising in the name of Al-Aqsa to "protect." All this assuming that territories and negotiate a final settlement would in itself, finally, no turning back, explicit and unequivocal recognition the State of Israel, and a definitive renunciation of terrorism, even though Fatah members continue burning flags, Palestinian children continue to grow educated in hatred, and that Abbas in his speeches in Arabic leave intact the possibility of resuming the fight armed if Israel did not yield to their claims.
face these issues, the exposure of Livni and Palestinians, good or bad depending on political ideology, is expressed and manifested, not go unnoticed.

A tangle of agreements and described, we must add a dose of Islamic fundamentalism always present in Middle East affairs, here makes his entrance on stage Hamas. Sami Abu Zuhri, spokesman for the group terrorist ruler of the Gaza Strip, said the leaked documents "are clear evidence that the Palestinian Authority secretly cooperating with the occupation (referring to Israel, whose name is not mentioned for not recognizing) and reflects its role to remove the just Palestinian cause (which according to his perspective is the conquest of all Palestine, the destruction of Israel and the annihilation of the Jews) ". The Fatah-Hamas feud (which resulted in violent acts primarily on the expulsion of the latter by the former Gaza) is old, with ideological differences and political will proceed. Religious fundamentalists knew long-standing cooperation on the AP with Israel against its members, and for them is high treason that an entity recognize Israel's Arab "Islamic territory" so that there were conflicts between the two Palestinian groups, but now that the documents tend to confirm that the PA was ready to make "unprecedented concessions" to Israel, the crisis will worsen and the fight for representation of the Palestinian people remain tense. Hamas has already responded once with a burst of violence against Fatah determinations were not to his liking, the nature of the Islamist terrorist organization leads us to believe that can happen at any time.
not be ruled out participation of Hamas more than mere protests and threats on the subject of leaks. Al-Jazeera is in Qatar, a country allied with Iran and Syria (which provided weapons and funding terrorist groups like Hamas) and whose government, led by Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani (founder of the TV channel) has shown widespread sympathy for the Islamist cause (supported by Hamas, among others). Qatar has allowed Hamas activities within its territory, the Islamists have established branches, carried out projects for investments in rushing entering terrorism, and received direct government assistance from al-Thani. Therefore, pay attention to a more than possible link between Al-Jazeera and Hamas to undermine and destabilize the AP, deflecting the political route and moving the map of Palestine. Thus Hamas could launch his coup in Judea and Samaria (West Bank) beat Abbas and take over the entire leadership, the only representative, and unifying the Palestinian government under his stormy.

will remain on the air, until everything is really confirmed or denied, the same questions of presence inevitable when dealing with double standards Palestinian leaders. If the reports show Abbas and Erekat willing to make concessions and proposed approach to Israel, why what they have to leave so desperately to deny? Is it to save the peace process? Or to save themselves? In any case, the question would be saved from what? If you are representing the will of the Palestinians, and are heading in a peace process Does your reaction is that the Palestinians really want peace? Possible that why you quit? Why are secretly negotiating with Jews when people do not want to negotiate with Jews? If an officer attempts to cross the reports by liars, false, out of context, does not correspond with reality, to save his position, maybe it's because that official is not following interests of the people who love him in that position. Did the representatives seeking to follow in the peace process only by political expediency, not in the interest of their constituents? Maybe the only reaction is a defense mechanism triggered by the fear that the Hamas attack. Perhaps it is only logical reaction of those who have been robbed by infiltrators, and threatens to not happen again.
Anyway, do not rush. Leaks can reveal how a change in Palestinian leadership (which for some reason did not warrant made public yet) that shows the distance between the "no" for Arafat to Barak, and the alleged restraint filtered AP. Or they may show more of the same, old Palestinian lies the negotiating table and speaking in English, while preparing the battlefield and Arabic speaking on a campaign of terror. Palestinian proposals have proved interesting, but continue the rituals of burning Israeli flags, studying children's books that compare Jews to pigs, the threat of returning to armed struggle (terrorism), the refusal to return to direct negotiation table, the public discourse and demands uncompromising (made visible) maximalist. That is, it takes many substantive changes. To which we must add the current global campaign for the unilateral AP Palestinian state and its recognition by other countries.
In my opinion this move is unilateral Palestinian clear sign that will not return to the negotiating table (at least until they are back with a rope around his neck), which should be the final result of an agreement as to be obtained without any agreement, and that his intransigence is equally palpable than before.
If the AP had failed to demonstrate true intentions in the documents of recent times filtered, much has been back since then. And none of the AP is too reliable. Ezequiel

Eiben
01/27/2011
22 Shevat 5771

Sources:

http://www.federacionsionista.com.mx/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=8326&Itemid=33 - Source: Jewish News Agency
http://www.aurora-israel.co. il/articulos/israel/Diplomacia/34759 /
http://www.aurora-israel.co.il/articulos/israel/Diplomacia/34758/
http://www.aurora-israel.co.il/articulos/ israel/Diplomacia/34756 /
http://www.aurora-israel.co.il/articulos/israel/Diplomacia/34742/
http://www.aurora-israel.co.il/articulos/israel/Diplomacia/ 34755 /
http://www.aurora-israel.co.il/articulos/israel/Diplomacia/34747/
http://www.aurora-israel.co.il/articulos/israel/Diplomacia/34746/
http://jaimegorenstein.com/cephimo/213/4859-las-principales-falacias-fronteras-y-refugiados-.html - "The main fallacies: frontiers and refugees" - Emmanuel Navon
http://www.enlacejudio .com/2011/01/23/qatar-2022 / - "Qatar 2022" - Julian Schvindlerman

What Does A Double Star Mean Pokemon

protocol failures in the Pope's visit to Santiago



How gives a present to the Pope or a character? Is it right to insist if you have previously warned that there be no gifts on a formal visit or State? The President of the Xunta seemed to understand, when those responsible for the logistics of the Pope's recent visit to Galicia was transferred the message of the Episcopal Conference in the sense of the current policy of Benedict XVI is not to fill the Vatican over objects hundreds of them already inhabit its museums and farms.
But despite this, the president of the regional government spent 6,000 euros budget the regional government to acquire a painting by Barreiro, who represents the cathedral. The Pope was received, but did not travel to Rome. He stayed in the Archbishopric of Santiago where he was until a few days, unless it has sent later. Worse was the
Rajoy. At the conclusion acts Obradoiro Square, the Pope was briefly the leader of the opposition, who could not think of anything other than deliver a package. Such was the figure of Sargadelos inside a cardboard box, wrapped with the corporate role of ceramics. Is it that can be delivered to the vicar of Christ on earth or any other person a present in this manner? Apart
that the Pope did not want more gifts (if you deliver it quietly as a memento of your stay or visit rosary (for Catholics) and a medal to others, generally.
protocol services and security of the Pope looks of astonishment crossed with members of the organization voyage, the English side, to the rareness of the situation. I want to give something, from what would have been to unwrap Rajoy figure and give it no more.
Be very careful with this gift of all. Fraga starred in your day another embarrassing situation during his visit to the headquarters of PSA-Peugeot Citroën Group. not previously reported that the family owns this car emporium boasts a long tradition Huguenot ie, Protestant and who have neither used nor religious images in their temples or at home. Fraga took him a statue of St. James, which the French received with courtesy amazed. Laughingly told some executives of the firm that poor James was never seen again. Maria Teresa Otero
Alvarado tells a funny story of how ingeniously resolve unexpected situations. During his time at the head of protocol of Andalusia or the Government Office can not remember exactly, was commissioned to purchase a gift of value to correspond to that of a Saudi leader to visit Sevilla. Saudi princes always give away things of great value, from a gold gumi a horse. Maria Teresa commissioned a replica of Giraldillo goldsmith silver. Only moments before delivery realized that allegory that crowns the Giralda former means "the triumph of faith over Islam." Fortunately, the then Deputy Prime Minister, Alfonso Guerra, was the ruts of the unexpected turn into something else wrong, "Before he said this figure was a symbol of the controversy between religions, we deliver it as an expression of love and reconciliation" . The case was the son of the prophet picked up the valuable present as if nothing had happened and was delighted.
As a corollary, three conclusions.
First, it is not always required or necessary to exchange gifts, and less of excessive value, status meetings and social gatherings. Depends on the object of the act, if it is symbolic in itself a gift-and the circumstances.
Second, there must be an adaptation of this act or the nature of their subject. In this regard, small works of art, books, folk art or even a medal is enough.
Third, that gifts are never delivered packaged inside the box (if a plate), but presented in a simple and natural, in view of everyone.
And besides, if previously warned us that no gifts, no stress.

Cervical Mucus At 5 Weeks Pregnant

Development Minister is notable for his attitude during a liturgy at the Cathedral of Santiago


A snapshot, taken by various photographers, during the recent conclusion of a ceremony, a solemn liturgy in the cathedral of Santiago, in the presence of the authorities of Galicia, the city and state, called attention Improper Development Minister José Blanco, who not only crossed his legs, improper attitude in the sanctuary of the temple, but repeatedly answered his phone calls and made other.
Among those who followed the developments in White with larger sample of pregnant and wonder were the mayor of Santiago. White, who is Catholic, was at all times outside the conclusion, as evidenced by the instant we collect.