In all the countries of Western democratic political system usually occurs, regardless of other circumstances, the same phenomenon, especially burdensome for the organization of private events, individuals, companies or government entities that encuadraríamos within what we define as civil society. We understand that all those public displays of non-official, ie that belong neither to the State, or structure, or their bodies or any other body of the General Administration, regional or local.
This phenomenon is repeated invasion or contamination of those events that civil society organizations and projects by government representatives who were given wrong or they themselves are assigned roles that do not correspond to the morphology of an event that is outside . They are the hosts, but in any event, the guests of honor or simply prominent guests, but it seems that they are presiding at an event or highlighting their own, which they themselves had organized.
Sometimes inexperience, lack of knowledge or decision of the organizers of these events allows the invasion of authorities, others accepted situations justified by the doctrine of lesser evil. But fold to blackmail or moral threat that will not go to the official if no chairs or at least contained in the president's responsibility or not.
As a first consideration is to deny that this invasion is inevitable and that in any case involving "insist" a lesser evil, perfectly acceptable, so to avoid embarrassment or tarnishing of the act, or the simple annoyance of the official guests if allowed to occupy the place at which they are entitled.
should be recalled here that the acts are acts of administrations ruled, subject to the rule of law are set. In the official world everything is or should be expected, but in the field of civil society is just the beginning On the contrary, everything that is lawful is not previously considered unlawful. Applying the principle of private autonomy, who can prevent a company or institution should have an organizational rules and protocol provided that does not infringe any of the common rules of current legislation governing the social life?
The confusion arises, I believe, two serious errors of principle: the aforementioned lack expertise, knowledge and authority of the very organization responsible for private events and, above all, and this is more seriously the confusion of roles by public authorities, who believe that their authority or representative (legal or political) transcends their specific area of \u200b\u200bpractice (the realm of official, of course) and automatically projected on any public event, while another character is organizing its private and therefore respond to another sociological representation.
In the private sector, government regulations acquire protocol, therefore, a different character to which the officer fully possess. The private entity sets for itself, because it has full capacity to do so, the standard of organization, but the rules of official protocol gives us the pattern for the standard of conduct, in terms of courtesy and respect we have to preserve and maintain to the position or personality invite public who, precisely because it is. But that does not mean anything but we must continue the consideration and respect due their rank within the overall scheme of authorities, we can treat it as an honored guest in a very limited and, in my opinion, give him the presidency, but that any time can be inferred that the morphology of the act that established the official protocol (which serves as a guideline only auxiliary or reference standard) and not our own sorting criteria.
When a proper act of a civil society body match a representative of the government, by invitation, and even the specific host, the first representation preserves gives official legal order in force, but no longer a guest who holds the receiver sociological and organizational representation of the entity concerned. The host can give the presidency of the act, which generally recommend not to do, or socially rewarding her guest with other forms of courtesy, as guest of honor this without losing the visible nature of their condition, taking into account that the communication protocol is a science and society captures and digests the messages that we launched.
The interpretation of the rules: 5 rules of conflict resolution
a) First: The rule of specialization. Adequate "Hair"
is, making a series of lists of authorities and representations, depending on the nature of the act to order. Each list must previously expurgated before being crossed with another. Therefore, it is necessary to bring the act to its true meaning and dimension, highlighting the representation according to its nature, within reasonable limits, among other things, at the same space.
b) Second, the weighting rule
Applying evaluation criteria of the valence of each organization or representative in terms of objective self-importance and representativeness of the institution or person that we put on a list of protocol.
c) Third: The rule of balance
addition to the traditional authorities, representatives of civil life should be properly treated and arranged with scrupulous standards of courtesy.
d) Fourthly, the rule linking
is common sense that if the president of the Chamber of Commerce or a particular undertaking an activity sponsored by a public entity, the representative of that corporation or company in question, must be placed, where appropriate, in a prominent place within the official act in question. In English this aspect Protocol is careful: a generous sponsor can be placed even close to the Queen herself.
e) Fifth: The rule of tradition
true that the Kingdom of Spain is a secular state and that the official protocol does not provide or provides a place where church authorities. But, how can you ignore the Municipality of Compostela to the archbishop of the city, which was also the lord of the city? Or how you can ignore the University of Santiago, which was founded precisely because an ancestor of the current archbishop? Therefore, in the absence of formal rule, the tradition comes to our aid, to strengthen itself in the realm of law, customs and traditions are sources of law. Conclusions
I. In a private-public event, company or institution, organization, and the protocol is determined by the host, who presides over the act and all other functions of the same.
II. In general, public authorities will be treated as guests of honor, established two categories, depending on their rank:
a) Authorities Preferred
b) Other authorities
III. The host determines the placement of public authorities, according to the principles of respect and courtesy.
IV. It is not envisaged dual presidency
V. The host may treat the most relevant public authority as
a) Guest of honor with transfer of the presidency.
b) Guest of honor without any transfer of the presidency.
In each of these assumptions have the most advantageous from the point of view of the precedence and ceremony, to highlight the character of the guest of honor.
VI. As appropriate to the morphology of the act, on the table or front office may:
a) Include the guest of honor
b) Include other guests of honor
c) While avoiding double presidency, Guest honor can be located in a prominent place to the right of the presidency, in the case of not cede that.
d) According to the nature of the act, taking into account that the chairs should be short, it may include other officials in the presidency, alternating with those of equivalent rank or category of company or institution.
VII. The order and position of the authorities invited pattern will continue as the official order of precedence effect. If not possible, try to respect their rank.
VIII. Depending on interest and organizing the event, and the number of officers present and the company or institution, you can opt for an alternate distribution of those either, by grouping sectors in two areas on both sides of an imaginary aisle. Viewed from the presidency, government authorities will be cast on the left, and members of the entity to the right.
IX. Given the large number of authorities will seek to implement at all times the rules of specialization, weight and balance. This translates into:
a) Specialization in light of the nature of the act. Not all authorities of the official list must be invited to all
b) Apply the evaluation of the valence of each organization or representative in terms of objective self-importance and representativeness of the institution or person that will place in our area
c) Representations of civilian life should be properly treated and arranged with scrupulous courtesy criteria in terms of its sociological representation.
X. Care should be taken especially respect for cultural traditions, applying the principle of analogy and traditions to locate those individuals not covered by the official protocol. Similarly, in the case of patrons, sponsors, notables and dignitaries altruists, placing his presence will be highlighted, depending on the nature of the event as guests of honor preferred.
0 comments:
Post a Comment