Appreciation U.S. for Osama Bin Laden killed
Gratitude to the United States for killing Osama Bin Laden, from those who love freedom, is lively and loud. "You're a hypocrite" I say more progressive "what you write with the hand you delete the elbow aleccionan me some leftists. It may sound harsh and contradictory the line that opens this article. However, it is very strong, but not at all contradictory. There is no hypocrisy in being liberal and spiritually to have accompanied the festivities at the White House and Ground Zero that night spontaneously colored American to the shock caused by so great news. Those who support the struggle at its best (ie armed struggle) against international terrorism, are in favor of military actions that kill jihadists who planned and planned the mass murder of hundreds of thousands of innocents. We want to see people free and not oppressed or massacred, we want peaceful relations between men peaceful, but not peace. Ludwig Von Mises said: "full and unconditional pacifism is tantamount to unconditional surrender before the ruthless tyrants" . And liberals love freedom and we will not give in to terrorist blackmail, which seeks to wrest concessions rather than give up their arms and totalitarian ideology to trade for the sincere negotiating table, or let us attack illegitimately claiming right reasons when in fact they have only rotten excuses. Those who seek our destruction, we warn that we will not fulfill its mission and try to defeat them first.
Hypocritical would be if I'm talking about freedom while fool let the terrorists gunned down humanity. I'm not going to incur the fallacies of those who deny reality and the apologists for Islamic terrorism. In addition, there is no contradiction in wanting freedom and peace and feel happy and peaceful time for the death of Bin Laden. Who has been killed is an innocent, is a terrorist. He is a murderer. As such, an enemy. His death is not the result of a policy of murder murderous fanaticism everywhere and propelled from the bottom of religious intolerance such as that promoted his own doctrine, being Al Qaeda faithful expression. His death is the result of self-defense of democracy against those who financed and executed annihilations macabre and succulent. It is the pursuit of justice to pay to blame for the passing of thousands of people.
is more than clear that freedom, after the ancient and tortuous process through which the man for it, we must defend the tyrants whose main concern is to see it reduced to insignificance and meaninglessness. Objectivist philosophy of Ayn Rand explains that nobody has the right to initiate physical force against another. And in this case following the consistent line of thought we know that the aggression caused by the Islamist terrorist deserved a reward, a strong response in defense of vital interests and against claims of genocide. The military action of the United States Army that took the life of an aggressor enemy of freedom is justified. Bin Laden was it, an aggressor enemy of freedom. Those blinded by prejudice and by applying theoretical constructs artificial reductionism and try to understand the phenomenon Bin Laden's jihadist only as a demonstration against the United States, or against Jews or against the western capitalist and eastern collaborators, are grossly mistaken. The expansionism of the jihad, not only to Al Qaeda, but many terrorist organizations, seeks to impose its law on all without exception. And without exception, means to humanity in its fullness. The goal to raise a great World Cup with the Sharia Caliphate coercing even every breath we try to give the Islamist goal is the end.
horror Many have wondered how it is possible that a President won the Nobel Peace Prize as Barack Obama has given a speech talking about justice and satisfaction when someone has been eliminated militarily. They should be asked: does being a winner of the Nobel Peace should mean being stupid?, Is there to kneel vulnerable and resigned to see how the innocent people killed for having received an award that would mean nothing if the winner is willing to fight for peace? Refreshing her memory, when Obama received his award he said, among other things, that "instruments of war have a role to play in maintaining peace" , "the belief that (peace) is required is rarely sufficient to achieve ", " the Negotiations can not convince the leaders of Al Qaeda that they must disarm ", and " saying that sometimes force is necessary is not a call to the cynicism, is a recognition of history ". I have no problem in saying that to my taste the award was undeserved Obama for not doing enough, and I am very critical of its policy in the international arena, but noblesse oblige and also recognize when it is successful.
The idea of \u200b\u200bcapturing Bin Laden (as the memorable episode of Saddam Hussein) and prosecution, which according to news sources and speakers was the priority, there would have been wrong to be implemented. But faced with impossibilities materials, which were able to settle this enemy is not to regret. While the leader of Al Qaeda in the environment gravitated to the level of old, their evil designs continued to be carried out by cells responding to his name. His death, beyond the implications it may have on the political level and within the context of the global jihadist threat, it is crucial symbolic. It sends a clear message to terrorism: America will not forget what you did, the West will not give up your gruesome speculations; terrorist aggressors, we will look to end their attacks. No matter if bin Laden was doing more, or is doing less, what he did and was a source enough to intercept.
Please note, warning of Pilar Rahola about what will happen in the media: "We'll see how Bin Laden is dead and the Americans will be the individual responsibility of the attacks that kill them. And it is possible that the Internet is the invention of the century, but the amount of idiots, and ignorant extremists who accumulates is also one of its great features. And when it comes to despise the Yankees and fans to minimize radical, paranoid army is immense ". Want to blame the United States to end who occupied a seat in the row of the worst enemies of their history, and a place of honor on the wall of bitter and violent enemies of freedom with a diploma in murder of men, women and children, is ridiculous. Moral relativists who screamed against imperialism, justify the 11 / 9 and complain about the U.S. retaliation, are only consistent with its unstable and stunted ideology, but shameful to the highest values \u200b\u200bto which the human spirit can aspire.
Finally, I am also very critical of certain actions and interference policies promoted by successive U.S. governments, but support the country in the exercise of its right to defend, I appreciate your courage and ask for blessings for his pursuit of justice. I congratulate those who were especially today involved in the military operation that is already anthology.
as well have said on other nefarious murderers: the death of Bin Laden contributes to making the world a little safer. Ezequiel
Eiben
05/05/2011
1, 5771 Iyyar
Sources:
- President Obama defends the necessity of war http://www.aurora-israel.co.il/articulos
/ israel/Diplomacia/26019 /
- The murderer is dead - Pilar Rahola
http://www.lavanguardia.com/opinion/articulos/20110504/54148172264/el-asesino-esta-muerto.html
- Remarks by the President Osama Bin Laden on http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-dead
0 comments:
Post a Comment